well, such a sight would be wasted on the common folk :-)
The article is either badly worded, or the chief didn't bother to clarify the "outside" of the home. Outside, while still annoying, isn't unreasonable as long as the property owner agrees to it and notices are posted.
Inside the home, which is what the article seems to imply, is another matter entirely.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Re: Don't see what;s wrong with it?
Date: 2006-02-18 11:28 pm (UTC)The article is either badly worded, or the chief didn't bother to clarify the "outside" of the home. Outside, while still annoying, isn't unreasonable as long as the property owner agrees to it and notices are posted.
Inside the home, which is what the article seems to imply, is another matter entirely.