When I first read this, I wanted to think that maybe this was a case of twisting her words by not showing everything she said. I mean, how can you believe this crud? But, there's nothing extra that could have been "forgotten" to be included that would make this make rational sense.
Then I realized what it actually is: A book filled with the most inflaming and controversial manure that she could think of, because that's what sells. Who cares if its even remotely true?
no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 06:57 pm (UTC)Then I realized what it actually is: A book filled with the most inflaming and controversial manure that she could think of, because that's what sells. Who cares if its even remotely true?