Sock Puppets??

[patgund]

In the on-going saga of Pokez and their mistreatment / assault of an autistic child, I noticed something:

In the Original Post, there's a sudden flood of people all claiming that the family is "lying" and are are conducting a "libelous witch-hunt" Not to mention the people who claim that the child isn't really autistic because "autistics can't talk", (which is what the restaurant is claiming.)

All seem to be either anonymous, or are from accounts that have been created in the last 24 hours.

I smell damage control and sock puppets here.

Comments

[mama-hogswatch.livejournal.com]

Okay, ya know what, even if autistic people COULDN'T talk (not true, and we all know that!)....

THE BITCH LAID HANDS ON A CHILD! SHE GRABBED AND SHOOK A CHILD. PERIOD.

The ONLY excuse she could POSSIBLY have was if she needed to physically defend herself. She's not claiming he assaulted her.

[patgund.livejournal.com]

There seem to be some people who believe that a place being "trendy", "hip" and "cool", excuse this behaviour.


I have a name for people like this - assholes. *self-centred* assholes

[shinobimaasch.livejournal.com]

I believe that people that can't talk are called "mute" not "autistic". If this is the level of research some of the posters are attempting, they aren't going to hold-up well in court. (Which is now where I predict this case may end-up with all the hubbris Pokez staff and patrons are dishing out. And which I believe is unfortunate, since a sincere apology could go a really long way on their part.)