And a couple more thoughts...
Oct. 20th, 2007 04:25 pmI admit I'm pretty much in the "so" category about the announcement of Dumbledore's sexuality. (Okay, he was good at the "swish" part, how was he about the "flick" portion as well?")
While talking to a friend about it though, she commented that "wow, surprised Rita Skeeter didn't touch on that too!".
I laughed and said: "Look. His brother was convicted for casting inappropriate charms on goats, still seems to have a thing for them, while other wizards get their blodgers off with giants and veelas. I think even Rita Skeeter knew that Dumbledore's sexual preferences were a "eh, who cares" in the wizardling world."
While talking to a friend about it though, she commented that "wow, surprised Rita Skeeter didn't touch on that too!".
I laughed and said: "Look. His brother was convicted for casting inappropriate charms on goats, still seems to have a thing for them, while other wizards get their blodgers off with giants and veelas. I think even Rita Skeeter knew that Dumbledore's sexual preferences were a "eh, who cares" in the wizardling world."
no subject
Date: 2007-10-20 11:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-20 11:52 pm (UTC)Besides, there may have been some belief that as long as he stuck with humans, it was all good. Witness the discrimination that "half-breeds" such as Hagrid (half-giant) and Lupin (werewolf) got, and the offense from the blood purity groups when Tonks married Lupin. I strongly suspect that same-sex parings with other humans was a non-issue, especially if it happened with "mudbloods" and half-bloods. A "pure-blood" may have been met with some disapproval unless he/she did something to insure that bloodline continued.