Worse British Royal ever??
Jul. 15th, 2008 11:30 amThe BBC has an article on which royal in British history may have been the worst to sit the throne.
Royally bad rulers
The top three they say are:
Edward II
Mary Queen of Scots
George IV
I'm actually kinda surprised by this. I would have added:
Mary I (Bloody Mary). Certainly the Marian Persecutions would have made her quite infamous)
Ethelred (Note, Danegeld, bad idea)
Matilda (Okay, technically didn't sit the throne, couldn't get herself crowned)
John Lackland certainly has one of the most historically bad reputations out there.
Richard II
George III (I'm surprised the loss of the American colonies didn't insure a spot on this list. However, his well known bouts of insanity caused by porphyria may excuse it.)
Edward VIII (From what I gather, there's still some bad feelings towards him and "that Wallis woman")
Royally bad rulers
The top three they say are:
Edward II
Mary Queen of Scots
George IV
I'm actually kinda surprised by this. I would have added:
Mary I (Bloody Mary). Certainly the Marian Persecutions would have made her quite infamous)
Ethelred (Note, Danegeld, bad idea)
Matilda (Okay, technically didn't sit the throne, couldn't get herself crowned)
John Lackland certainly has one of the most historically bad reputations out there.
Richard II
George III (I'm surprised the loss of the American colonies didn't insure a spot on this list. However, his well known bouts of insanity caused by porphyria may excuse it.)
Edward VIII (From what I gather, there's still some bad feelings towards him and "that Wallis woman")
no subject
Date: 2008-07-15 06:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 02:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 02:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 02:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-15 07:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 02:19 am (UTC)Richard II made a lot of promises that he reneged on, was constantly fighting with his "advisors" and with Parliament and was deposed and that lead to civil war.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_II_of_England
no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 02:41 am (UTC)I'd consider his promises to Wat Tyler a matter of realpolitik rather than a major political flub.
I do agree that Richard III is a hatchetjob of the Plantagenets and a glorification of Henry, but I think that Richard II suffers from the need to create a character that is weak enough to justify Bolingbroke's rebellion but sympathetic enough to call back to during I and 2 Henry IV.
As far as worst monarchs go, I think Charles I is worse than Richard II.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-15 07:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-15 10:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 02:09 am (UTC)And Edward VIII was never crowned, because of "that Wallis Woman".
no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 02:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-16 05:19 pm (UTC)One of the people hated George IV so much that he doesn't want him to win anything, even the title of Britain's worst monarch...