Doesn't get it, or too full of himself?
May. 4th, 2005 12:46 pmThere are times I really think Orson Scott Card is just too full of himself. (well, that and he's too much in love with his own writing to realize when a series much be finished once and for all.)
His rant against "Star Trek" is a great example of this.
Strange New World: No 'Star Trek'(LA Times)
"So why did the Trekkies throw themselves into this poorly imagined, weakly written, badly acted television series with such commitment and dedication? Why did it last so long?
Here's what I think: Most people weren't reading all that brilliant science fiction. Most people weren't reading at all. So when they saw "Star Trek," primitive as it was, it was their first glimpse of science fiction. It was grade school for those who had let the whole science fiction revolution pass them by."
(shakes head and sighs)
His rant against "Star Trek" is a great example of this.
Strange New World: No 'Star Trek'(LA Times)
"So why did the Trekkies throw themselves into this poorly imagined, weakly written, badly acted television series with such commitment and dedication? Why did it last so long?
Here's what I think: Most people weren't reading all that brilliant science fiction. Most people weren't reading at all. So when they saw "Star Trek," primitive as it was, it was their first glimpse of science fiction. It was grade school for those who had let the whole science fiction revolution pass them by."
(shakes head and sighs)
no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 08:32 pm (UTC)I had just about gotten over my distaste for him personally after his whole "gays have OCD" episode from about the time he published Xenocide when he launched his whole "marriage is for straight people only" campaign on his website. I know I should separate the author from his work, but I couldn't.
I certainly wouldn't mind at all if Mr. Card suddenly faded into obscurity.
JOhn.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 09:43 pm (UTC)I really think Card needs a good cup of shut the f*ck up on occasion
no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 09:11 pm (UTC)http://www.writergroupie.com/columns/cardtrekcolumn.htm
I think Jill Sherwin did a nice job of skewering him. I suspect at least partially, this may have happened because a) he got a script or story idea turned down (or misappropriated), b) his book sales are slipping and he wants some publicity, c) He couldn't sell the "Ender" concept or the "Prentice Alvin" concept as series, d) he's p.o.'d that Ken Jennings is more famous than he (he's from Utah), or e) he merely had a bug up his shorts.
He is related to an old Army friend of mine, who always found it weird to see his name on books. She referred to him as "my weird cousin Scott, who no one in the family gets along with."
no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 09:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 09:58 pm (UTC)I happen to agree that there's been enough of Trek. I -like- the original series though... not because of writing or acting but because they were so low budget fans were used to fill out the extra characters and writing.... Any show or story which includes and -welcomes- fandom to take part in it has quite a bit in favour. (as long as the show is respectful anyways).
I could be totally off though.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 10:16 pm (UTC)But I think Card's comments were way off base, and smacks too much of a "my way is the only way" attitude - or a level of elitism against media SF vs. print SF.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-04 11:03 pm (UTC)Card? Elitist? LOL. WAY too true.